Risk, Fear And Consequences
Reading my horoscope from Free Will Astrology(old hippie guy) has set me on a not so wreckless course of...Affirming to myself it's OK to think deep. (It deserves a link, but linking is not linking at this juncture)
"Fear is a sickness. It will crawl into the soul of anyone who engages it."
Flint Sky, Father of Jaguar Paw in the movie Apocalypto
"The difference between a fear and a consequence is acceptance. A fear is an outcome you resist. A consequence is an outcome you accept"
Steve Pavlina
"Who cares what the neighbors say, they're gonna talk about us anyway."
From The New York Dolls "Running Around"
My mind does wonder. I often think...Allot of people let fear run their life. They will not take action out of fear of change, fear that they will fail, or someone will think that they failed. Someone once said to me "people are 'right' because they are afraid", implying that someone did something because they didn't want to be "wrong" in someone else's eyes or to prove someone right. People will not make a positive move because it will cause change, preferring mediocrity, and mediocrity is spiritual retrograde. I seen the Iraqi's do this on a daily basis, then, turn and live in the moment to sink back into their gloom.
I can't count the number of times my parents, or some leader in the Army...Or myself saying to someone, you have to accept the consequences of your actions. This was usually done after some action that was...Let's say, negative. Yet, there are consequences to positive actions as well. A popular saying amongst my fellow Rangers was, "there is no action without a reaction". It's natural law. Now let's look at the definition of consequences. "Something that follows from an action or condition; effect", from the American Heritage Dictionary. It didn't say anything bad.
The truth is, I do not stand here high and mighty on my soap box. I've been guilty of this too. Now less often. It has shaped my thinking, and I'm not often understood. People sometimes don't know what to make of me. Yet, if your going to be a freedom fighter, you need to be free. So this is an explanation in hopes that it will benefit the masses, that's you'l.
This is not a complete post. You can see when I started writing it, and then publish it. It's a collection of thoughts and qoutes put together a little bit at a time.
The following I got from Robert Burney, I've come across his web a few times over the years, and find what he say's intrigueing. The qoute below is his twist on Emerson's Risk.
Risking
To laugh is to risk appearing the fool.
To weep is to risk appearing sentimental.
To reach out for another is to risk involvement.
To expose your feelings is to risk exposing your true self.
To place your ideas, your dreams before a crowd is to risk their loss.
To Love is to risk not being loved in return.
To live is to risk dying.
To hope it to risk despair.
To try it to risk failure.
But, risks must be taken because the greatest hazard in life is to risk nothing at all.
The person who risks nothing still does not avoid suffering and sorrow because suffering and sorrow are an unavoidable part of life.
What they avoid by not taking risks it the opportunity to learn, feel, change, grow, Love, live.
Chained by their certitudes, they are a slave. The have forfeited their freedom.
Only a person who risks is free.
Someone sent an e-mail to let me know that this poem was written by Ralph Waldo Emerson. I found out that there were a couple of words missing from one line - this color above. Had I known it was by Emerson I probably wouldn't have made a change in it. When I ran across it as an anonymous work years ago, I did a slight adaptation because I thought one of the lines was shaming - and I do not think it is possible to avoid suffering and sorrow. Here is the last part of the poem as is it credited to Emerson with the text that is different from the one above that I have had posted here in that other color.
But risks must be taken because the greatest hazard in life is to risk nothing.
The person who risks nothing...has nothing..is nothing.
You may avoid suffering and sorrow,
but you simply cannot learn, feel, change, grow, love...live.
Chained by your certitudes, you are a slave; you have forfeited freedom.
Only a person who risks is free.
by Ralph Waldo Emerson
Now, The Cult's "Rise"
Simply,
The Appalachianist
2 Comments:
Boy, I really hushed you'll up.
Dear Appalachianist,
I just came across your site via providence and synchronicity. (I was actually doing a Google search for something else.) The timing of my stumbling upon your site astonished me and I delighted in reading your thoughts about "Fear". You’ll soon see why my finding your post is so uncanny. Plus, I need your help with something else.
Earlier today, I was writing some notes about “Fear” as being the main block to Awareness for an essay that I might title: “Learned Obliviousness and Willful Ignore-ance”. A bit of what I’d written:
“Fear of change leads to inaction and paralysis. Courage to change requires commitment, determination, tenacity and time. We have become morally and spiritually lazy and cowardly. It takes courage to speak truth. Not speaking truth permits us to remain victims and condones the continued victimization of others. Silence still means consent. “I don’t want to get involved” means “I have other priorities, namely my time, my energy, my money, my contentment.” Complacency is decay.”
…and…
“There are problems with becoming Aware. Awareness leads to exposing true Meanings, the meanings of: spoken words, relationship dynamics, unmet promises, advertising hype, unhealthy behaviors, manipulative agendas, outright lies, inaction, and on and on. Exposed truth forces us into the position of having to weigh and decide between the beneficial and harmful or, simply, truth and lie. Furthermore, it is still “politically incorrect’ to stray from the chief imperative of Humanism, namely, moral relativism. Moral relativism states that the Self is prime and the hell with everyone else. Humanism took root here in the late 69’s and 70’s via the Mahrishi/TM movement and morphed into a new-branch psychology and a quasi-spiritual masquerade and justification for sociopathy. Worst of all, a discovering of empirical, blatant Meaning requires Action and Time and sometimes, Disruption and Money.”
…Etc, etc…(These are just notes.)
See what I mean? Who was reading whose mind here?
Perhaps you are supposed to be the one who can help me out? What I had originally Googled was: “The Free Man Appalachian spirituality beliefs”.
I was researching this because there is a man who is supposed to be doing a ritual next month from what calls “The Free Man Tradition” at our local Sonoma County Pagan Network. He told me that settlers who were opposed to the serf system of Europe began The Free Man tradition here. In a hushed tone, he confided in me that “It’s even a part of our code that a Free Man has the right to actually kill anyone who tries to enslave another.”
After an hour of Googling many different possibilities, I’ve found absolutely nothing that even remotely resembles what he is talking about except of a link to a blog called The Free Man’s Garden and a Journal called “The Freeman: Ideas on Liberty”, that purports itself as fifty years old and is currently published by The Foundation for Economic Education @:
http://www.fee.org/publications/the-freeman/default.asp
I consider myself to be a competent researcher and I’ve delved into some pretty arcane areas but I’m beginning to believe that the “Free Man Tradition” may be a fabrication? Perhaps the man is a long-time subscriber to the journal I just mentioned and has devised a tradition of his own based on this journal? There is, of course, nothing wrong with originating a tradition unless he purports it to be one of historical standing.
Have you ever heard of “The Free man” tradition? If so, do you know where I could find some online info?
Also, can you tell me something about the wonderful photo of Native Americans that you published here?
Thank you,
Diana V
Post a Comment
<< Home